drupal analytics
SHAPE
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH ABOUT SHAPE BACK TO E-JOURNAL


Special Issue 65 of SHAPE on Jim Schofield's Substrate Theory

The Team


Jim Schofield - Author / Editor

Physicist, Philosopher, Marxist, Multimedia Expert, Mathematician, Author, Sculptor.

Dr. Peter Mothersole -
Advisor / Editor

Senior Lecturer in Computing, Physicist, Photographer, Constructivist, Software Developer, Philosopher.

Mick Schofield -
Art Director / Editor

Writer, Researcher, Photographer, Artist, Designer
 
 


10 years of SHAPE
Special Issue 65

Substrate Theory II

Towards the New Physics
Jim Schofield



The Substrate: An Introduction

Quantized Electron Orbits within Atoms
but without Copenhagen

Returning to Materialism?
Alternative Approaches to Reality:
Wilczek’s Materiality of the Vacuum

Nothing is Empty:

The Dialectics of Wave Particle Duality

Charge and Force

The Spacetime Continuum
and the Universal Substrate

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle
and an Undetectable Substrate

A Mirror of Reality at the Quantum Level?

Movement Effects the Substrate

Phase and Locality

Streams, Vortices and Electromagnetism

Substrates and Media

Energy Landscapes

Casimir Effect and Substrate Theory

Superfluid Substrate

Time Crystals and the Universal Substrate

Dark Matter and Galaxies

The Substrate Universe

The Possible Origin of the Universal Substrate




Read PDF
(Right click link to Download)


Editorial

Welcome to Special Issue 65 of SHAPE Journal, the second in a special two part series on Substrate Theory, compiled to mark 10 years of this journal.

This selection of papers constitute more recent additions to this burgeoning theory and many of these have never been published before.

Increasingly, I no longer feel like a lone voice in this. Other physicists are starting to move in this direction - Lee Smolin and Frank Wilczek are joining a growing group of dissenters in mainstream Physics, unhappy with its infinite descent into the Idealist wormhole, away from materialism and realism.

This series is a significant celebration of both the Journal’s (and its principle theorist’s) 10 years spent in theoretically addressing the current ever-deepening crisis in Modern Physics. This is represented by the now consensus position embodied in the premises of this subject as they are brought together in The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory, which has steadfastly taken Physics away from physical Explanation of reality, and instead towards a wholly idealist stance, that assigns full causality only to the set of formal equations, primarily derived from High Speed Accelerator Experiments, primarily conducted at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

My hypothesis is that Copenhagen was almost universally instituted throughout Sub Atomic Physics, as a set of formal tricks for dealing with a missing / hidden Substrate - papering over the cracks of the waves in nothing.

Elsewhere, in my book The Real Philosophy of Science, these philosophical problems have been tackled, but here we must also tackle physically the very real possibility of an undetectable Universal Substrate - look at why it might have escaped detection and how we might finally prove its existence.





Jim Schofield
JUNE 2019